Guides and analysis
Practical guides on CBAM, EUDR and AI adoption in regulated processes. No hype — just what you need to know and what to do.
Who actually checks you — and with what tools
A satellite reference layer, a central registry, mandatory inspection quotas of 1/3/9%, a Commission preliminary calculation. What tools authorities have, and why the answer differs radically between member states.
Read the article →2026, the year “we are compliant” stopped meaning anything
CBAM, EUDR and the AI Act are simultaneously moving the standard from “you filled in the document” to “the information matches reality”. Why perfect files no longer protect you.
Read the article →The EU AI Act in brief: what your company must do, and by when
The full timeline after the Digital Omnibus postponement, the four risk levels, the five compliance steps for a company that merely uses AI, and the applicable penalties.
Read the article →Who checks the AI the state buys?
Public institutions are already buying “AI-powered” solutions but evaluate them with criteria written for classic software. Deployer obligations, where Romania stands on national authorities, and what a contracting authority can do now.
Read the article →ISO/IEC 42001 and the EU AI Act: building your AI governance before the legal deadlines
What the standard is, how it maps to the AI Act obligations for high-risk systems, the 38 Annex A controls by category and what certification does not solve.
Read the article →EUDR: a guide for importers — your obligations and how to prepare before 30 December 2026
Who is in scope, the three prohibitions, due diligence obligations (Art. 9–11), plot geolocation, filing the DDS and the preparation checklist.
Read the article →CBAM in 2026: a practical guide for importers — definitive regime, deadlines and costs
The definitive regime started on 1 January 2026. The 50-tonne threshold, declarant authorisation, emissions calculation, certificates and common pitfalls.
Read the article →